FTCE Professional Education Practice Exam

What is a disadvantage of drill and practice math programs in classrooms?

1. They are ineffective for learning

2. Most classrooms lack sufficient computers

3. They do not engage students

4. They are costly to implement

The correct answer is: Most classrooms lack sufficient computers

The chosen answer highlights a logistical concern that can hinder the effectiveness of drill and practice math programs. A disadvantage related to the logistical aspect of technology in education is indeed that many classrooms might not have enough computers to ensure all students can participate simultaneously. This lack of access can lead to inequitable learning opportunities where only a few students are able to engage with the material while others are left out, limiting the overall effectiveness of the program. However, while this addresses an important infrastructure issue, it does not comprehensively cover the fundamental disadvantages of drill and practice programs themselves. For instance, concerns about student engagement and the effectiveness of learning can be significant factors. Drill and practice programs often emphasize rote memorization and repetitive tasks, which can lead to disengagement among students who may not find this method stimulating or relevant to their learning styles. An emphasis on these programs can also overshadow the need for conceptual understanding and application in mathematics, which are critical for deeper learning. In this context, examining both the potential lack of student engagement and the effectiveness of learning remains crucial to fully understanding the limitations of drill and practice exercises in the educational landscape.